Everything Hertz

179: Discovery vs. maintenance

Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and...

• 0
• 0
• 21 días

178: Alerting researchers about retractions

Dan and James discuss the Retractobot service, which emails authors about papers they've cited...

• 0
• 0
• 2 meses

177: Plagiarism

We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you...

• 0
• 0
• 3 meses

176: Tracking academic workloads

We chat about a paper on the invisible workload of open science and why academics are so bad at...

• 0
• 0
• 4 meses

175: Defending against the scientific dark arts

We chat about a recent blogpost from Dorothy Bishop, in which she proposes a Master course that...

• 0
• 0
• 4 meses

174: Smug missionaries with test tubes

James proposes proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative...

• 0
• 0
• 6 meses

173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate...

• 0
• 0
• 7 meses

172: In defence of the discussion section

Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other...

• 0
• 0
• 8 meses

171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)

We chat with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris about the science of cons and how we can we...

• 0
• 0
• 9 meses

170: Holy sheet

We discuss evidence of data tampering in a series of experiments investigating dishonesty...

• 0
• 0
• 10 meses

169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)

In our first ever live and in-person episode, we chat with Sandra Matz about the opportunities...

• 0
• 0
• 11 meses

168: Meta-meta-science

Dan and James discuss a new paper that reviews potential issues in metascience practices. They...

• 0
• 0
• 12 meses

167: Diluted effect sizes

Dan and James chat about a new study that uses homeopathy studies to evaluate bias in biomedical...

• 0
• 0
• 1 año

166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that claims that science is becoming less disruptive over...

• 0
• 0
• 1 año

165: Self-promotion

Dan and James chat about self-promotion in academia, how they both wish they had doctoral...

• 0
• 0
• 1 año

164: The great migration

James and Dan discuss the recent migration of scientists from Twitter to Mastodon and the pros...

• 0
• 0
• 1 año

163: eLife's new peer review model

Dan and James discuss eLife's new peer review model, in which they no longer make accept/reject...

• 0
• 0
• 1 año

162: Status bias in peer review

We chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in...

• 0
• 0
• 1 año

161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)

Dan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open...

• 0
• 0
• 1 año

160: Whistleblowing

Dan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct. The Safe Faculty...

• 0
• 0
• 1 año